Skip to content

    Sherpa is now Navorda. Read the announcement

    Navorda
    Comparison

    Sitetracker alternatives for energy project development

    Sitetracker is built for deployment throughput — running the same site workflow across thousands of sites, in many industries. Navorda is built for development depth in one industry: plots, permits, baselines, counterparts, SPVs and quantified risk as first-class objects in a single European-oriented data model.

    What Sitetracker does

    Sitetracker describes itself as "One Complete Platform to Plan, Build, Operate and Maintain Critical Infrastructure" and positions itself as a leader in asset lifecycle management. It serves telecommunications, fiber, towers, data centres and satellite alongside renewable energy, BESS, EV charging and utilities, covering — in its own words for renewables — "financing, site assessments, and permitting, to design, construction and interconnection, and long-term asset management". The platform is built natively on Salesforce, publishes SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and ISO 27701 compliance, and lists 55+ live integrations.

    Sources

    Everything above is drawn from Sitetracker's own public material and was accurate as of August 2026.

    Page last updated

    Dimension by dimension

    Where the two products genuinely differ — and where they simply target different problems.

    Swipe sideways to see every column.

    DimensionSitetrackerNavorda
    Primary design goalRepeatable deployment at volume — the same site workflow applied across thousands of sites and several industries.Development control in one industry — pre-construction land, permitting, risk and ownership for energy assets.
    Land and cadastreSites and assets are first-class; land agreements are handled as project records and documents.Plots, counterparts and securement mechanisms (lease, surface right, purchase, expropriation, concession) are first-class, on a native map, with Spanish Catastro GML parsed on import.
    PermittingPermitting is covered as a stage of the site workflow.Permitting processes are modelled per country and technology, tracked against versioned approved baselines so deviation is measured, not just observed.
    Schedule controlProject and financial management with standardised processes, designed for repeatability across high site volumes.Multiple approved baselines (monthly, yearly, custom) with live deviation tracking, and scenario planning that does not overwrite the baseline.
    RiskTracked within project and compliance workflows.Quantified as time-at-risk and cost-at-risk — days and euros, before and after mitigation — and rolled up across the portfolio (Navorda Risks, an optional add-on).
    Ownership and transactionsNot a core focus of the platform.SPVs, holding structures, equity and voting rights modelled in Navorda Transactions (add-on); executing an SPA updates the shareholder structure automatically.
    GeographyGlobal deployments with a strong North American installed base.Built for European multi-country portfolios; 300+ projects managed across 14+ countries.
    Platform and procurementNative on Salesforce; enterprise licensing, typically a services-led implementation.Standalone AWS-native SaaS via AWS Marketplace. Portfolio-based commercial model: scope defined by portfolio size, required capabilities and enterprise integration needs; structured onboarding in four to eight weeks. How pricing works →
    CertificationsSOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and ISO 27701.AWS-native security architecture with SSO, four-role RBAC and audit trails; ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are in progress, not yet completed. Current status on the security page →
    AI accessAnalytics and AI features within the Salesforce ecosystem.Navorda AI (optional: seven agents running inside Navorda on governed data), plus the Navorda MCP Connector — included in Navorda Platform, a native MCP server — so Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor can query the portfolio live — read-only, OAuth 2.1, landowner PII structurally excluded.

    This page is maintained by CabSan Solutions, which builds Navorda — so read it as an informed but interested source. Everything stated about the other vendor is drawn from their own public material, linked above, and was accurate as of the date shown. Vendors change their products; verify anything decision-critical with them directly. If you believe something here is wrong or out of date, email info@cabsansolutions.com and we will correct it.

    Which one you should actually buy

    We would rather you rule Navorda out in five minutes than discover the mismatch in month four.

    Choose Sitetracker if…

    • You are deploying at high volume across many near-identical sites — EV charging, telecom, fiber — where throughput matters more than per-project depth.
    • Your portfolio is primarily North American, and US interconnection and utility workflows are the centre of gravity.
    • You already run Salesforce and want your infrastructure programme inside that ecosystem, with the admin skills and integrations you already have.
    • Procurement requires ISO 27001 and SOC 2 attestations today. Sitetracker has them; Navorda does not yet.
    • You need construction and field-work execution — dispatch, crews, field tickets — as a core part of the system, not an adjacent one.
    • You are a large enterprise that prefers a big vendor with a deep partner network, and can absorb a services-led implementation.

    Choose Navorda if…

    • Your bottleneck is pre-construction, not rollout: land not secured, permits slipping, and no reliable way to prove when a date actually moved.
    • You work across several European countries and need permitting modelled per jurisdiction rather than one fixed workflow.
    • Cadastral data is part of daily work and waiting on a GIS analyst to open a GML file is a real constraint.
    • You need risk expressed in days and euros for an investment committee, not a colour-coded list.
    • SPVs, shareholder structures and SPAs are part of how you run the portfolio.
    • You want to be live in weeks on one workflow, not to run a multi-quarter enterprise programme.
    • You want your own AI assistant to query the portfolio directly through MCP.

    Other Sitetracker alternatives worth considering

    Navorda is one answer, not the only one. Depending on where your bottleneck sits, these also belong on the shortlist.

    • Matidor

      Map-based project management, well suited to geographically dispersed sites with significant field activity.

    • Radian Digital

      Radian Generation's software platform — lighter-weight, aimed at early-stage development: permitting, land acquisition and interconnection milestones.

    • QBi Solutions

      End-to-end renewable business management — development, construction, operation and M&A — from Madrid and New York. The breadth pick when you want one system for the whole business, operating assets included.

    • Cora Systems

      Enterprise PPM used for complex multi-year programmes, with a renewable-energy vertical — strong governance and portfolio discipline; energy development's native entities are emulated with custom fields.

    Frequently asked questions

    For energy project development in Europe, yes — Navorda covers land securization, permitting against approved baselines, quantified risk, SPAs, project finance and portfolio reporting in one data model. For high-volume site deployment across telecom, fiber or EV charging, Sitetracker is the more established fit and Navorda is not trying to replace it.

    Breadth versus depth. Sitetracker applies one repeatable site-deployment workflow across many industries at volume. Navorda models one industry deeply: plots, permits, baselines, counterparts, SPVs and quantified risk as native objects, built for European multi-country permitting with Spanish Catastro parsing. Sitetracker is strongest once you are building; Navorda is strongest before you are.

    Yes — Sitetracker states it is built natively on Salesforce, which brings Salesforce's enterprise security and integration ecosystem. That is an advantage if you already run Salesforce, and an added cost and dependency if you do not. Navorda is a standalone AWS-native platform procured through the AWS Marketplace, with a portfolio-based commercial model rather than per-seat licensing.

    Sitetracker is enterprise-priced and typically implemented through a services-led programme. Navorda runs a structured four-to-eight-week onboarding — discovery, configuration, data migration, map activation, training, supported go-live — and you can start with a single workflow such as permits or land rather than rolling out enterprise-wide on day one. Navorda's commercial model is portfolio-based: pricing is primarily aligned with the portfolio under governance rather than traditional per-seat licensing, and the commercial scope is defined by portfolio size, required capabilities and enterprise integration needs, transacted through the AWS Marketplace or contracted directly — see navorda.com/pricing for how it works.

    It depends on where your bottleneck is. For European pre-construction control — land securization, permitting against approved baselines, quantified risk and ownership — Navorda is built for exactly that job. Matidor is a lighter map-based option for dispersed sites with heavy field activity. Radian Digital targets early-stage development: permitting, land acquisition and interconnection milestones. QBi Solutions offers whole-business breadth from business development and M&A through operation. Cora Systems brings enterprise PPM governance with a renewable-energy vertical, with energy entities emulated via custom fields. And if you are deploying high volumes of near-identical sites, staying with Sitetracker is often the right call.

    Other comparisons

    Judge Navorda against your own portfolio

    Bring your plots, your permit processes and your ownership structures. Thirty minutes is usually enough to tell whether this is the right tool for you — or whether one of the alternatives above is.

    Take the 5-minute assessment